The Asylum
In The Bell Jar, the line between treatment and control gets blurry. Esther’s time in the hospital doesn’t feel purely medical, but it does not read as cartoonishly cruel either.
After her suicide attempt, she is moved into institutional space, evaluated, scheduled, handled. The first electroshock treatment, given by Dr. Gordon without adequate preparation, feels like he's trying to make it a punishment The room is impersonal and Esther experiences the procedure as violent and humiliating. The intent may have been therapeutic, but she is strapped down, silenced, corrected. Her body becomes something to manage.
Later she receives shock therapy under Dr. Nolan and it's interpreted differently. There is an explanation. There is sedation. There is a sense, however fragile, of collaboration. The treatment itself is the same procedure, but the framing of it changes the experience. It shows that institutional care in the 1950s was not a single fixed thing. It depended heavily on who held authority and how they understood the patient. Esther is not only ill, she is also a young woman whose despair disrupts the social script laid out for her. The hospital seemingly becomes a place where disruption is processed, contained, and reshaped into something acceptable. Like a hot dog.
The novel also makes clear how closely Esther’s breakdown is tied to social pressure. Before the hospital, she is expected to excel academically, remain sexually pure yet attractive, secure a future, and move smoothly into adulthood. When she cannot perform those roles, the failure reads as pathology. Institutionalization steps in where social expectation collapses. The bell jar itself becomes a metaphor for that suffocation: a sealed environment where everything is distorted and warped and Esther is cut off from ordinary life.
What makes The Bell Jar so unsettling is that it doesn’t offer a simple answer to whether institutional care is punishment or treatment. Esther does improve. She leaves the hospital. There is progress. Yet the improvement comes within a structure that never fully questions the cultural forces that helped produce her collapse. The institution stabilizes her enough to return her to society, but society itself remains unchanged.
Alana! It's really interesting that you highlight the vague moral commentary on institutional care on Plath's part. It isn't clear if institutionalizing truly helps Esther, or if it only helps her fit in with the deeply flawed world she lives in. Especially without the second installment that was planned, Esther's continued improvement is only the reader's dream--one we do not know will come to fruition. I think contrasting the two instances of psychiatric treatment Esther undergoes does at least display she has some semblance of choice in her life, which certainly helped her mental health. Very introspective and thoughtful blog post :).
ReplyDeleteWOAH. This is such a good blog. You mention so many insightful thoughts that I never considered before! My favorite comparison you use is the juxtaposition of Dr. Gordan's treatment of Esther's body as something to manage compared to Dr. Nolan's more collaborative, respectful, and healing approach.
ReplyDeleteHi Alana! I really like the way you articulate that The Bell Jar doesn't necessarily take a stance on if institutional care is "punishment or treatment." Rather, we simply understand Esther's perspective, experiences, and opinions. Your point about how the hospital may have given Esther progress, but not society is so insightful! I found your comment about the hot dogs at first amusing, but also strangely true in a complicated sense. Great post!
ReplyDeleteAlana, I LOVED how you compared this to real live 1950s society and the asylum dynamic. It really plays into how women would be dismissed as "crazy" in like the 1850s-1900s era, and how some of that reflects into this time and into some of the specific treatment she receives. It's especially different with Dr Nolan and the fact that she cares enough to listen to her and not dismiss her. Incredible job!!
ReplyDeleteInteresting ideas! I agree, I feel as though the bell jar remains unsettling in subduing her suicidal tendencies but also suffocating her enough to appear complacent (she ends up with a child), as part of her healing... I wonder, do you think Esther would have had the same breakdown today? Do you think the healing would have looked different?
ReplyDeleteHi, Alana! I enjoyed reading your post. One of the saddest parts of the book for me was her first shock therapy session. I think you did a great job in interpreting and breaking it down. I really like the line "Esther’s breakdown is tied to social pressure" because it's not only applicable in this situation, but MANY others in the book. I wonder if Plath's breakdown in real life(from her suicide) was somehow tied to social pressure; I think it may have been.
ReplyDeleteI really like this reflection on the very different effects of Drs. Gordon and Nolan administering the "same" treatment to Esther. In the first instance, readers might suspect that the novel is going to expose and critique the barbaric and crude practices of a psychiatric institution, but you're right that this in not ultimately where Plath is headed. In fact, Plath viewed this ordeal as ultimately helping her--she survives her life-threatening illness, and had been doing well with the bell jar "suspended overhead" for a decade at the time she wrote the novel. Instead we get a pointed critique of Dr. Gordon in gendered terms: his manipulation and torment of her body and mind recalls Buddy Willard and his buddies "delivering" Mrs. Tomalillo's baby in the earlier scene, and Esther is wary of being "brainwashed" by their system. But Dr. Nolan is a revelation, in every way: she is actually MORE authoritative, in her confident declaration that Gordon did not administer the treatment correctly, and she is proven correct in her insistence that the treatment WILL help, along with lithium, if it is done the right way. I like your description of the Esther-Nolan dynamic as "collaborative": the "prescription" of birth control (and Nolan's enabling of Esther's search for a one-night-stand in Cambridge) ends up having a profound impact on Esther's recovery, and it's something that would not have been possible with Gordon (or likely ANY male doctor).
ReplyDeleteHi Alana! This a really intellectual blog, it really makes you think about how the mental health system in the 50's was highlighted throughout the book. I think the most shocking part (pun intended) it that it was crazy that Dr. Gordon did shock therapy on her but had to much of an ego to admit it was wrong or even know. Really great blog!
ReplyDelete